From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3885b7fd66a1db28
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-08 10:54:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!cambridge1-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why is Ada NOT a good choice for a beginner to programming?
References: <au0nld$b0$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>
 <mailman.1040449452.29831.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <15FN9.2313$c6.2612@bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
 <mailman.1040664961.4038.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <au7kqt$uum$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>
 <mailman.1040671026.6867.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <wccd6nsjuzu.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <d7ch0vsi7ek3n1occ3l6ulve15j1qmatj6@4ax.com>
 <wccfzso9rbb.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <BrXQ9.2323$c6.2543@bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
 <8ivo1vo5ir3piqsck4ondj0cuo47g426kf@4ax.com>
 <9gMS9.483613$GR5.189928@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <ft_S9.2369$c6.2643@bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:54:02 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.133.155
X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com
X-Trace: bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1042052043 151.168.133.155 (Wed,
 08 Jan 2003 13:54:03 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:54:03 EST
Organization: Raytheon Company
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32763
Date: 2003-01-08T13:54:02-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> I am not sure about Dijkstra's complaints (here are some
> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd06xx/EWD663.PDF
> but they do not seem to be real attacks on the language but more the
> style of the spec. They also seem pretty valid)

I haven't yet read that one.  A week or so back,
someone posted a similar link in which Dijkstra
said that derived types and subtypes was a stupid
idea.  (And similar comments about other features.)