From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,880dedb1fc49bf73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:00:23 -0600
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:47:25 -0500
From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse
References: <1141025263.921588.5390@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1141025263.921588.5390@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <ft1bd3-u49.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171
X-Trace: 
 sv3-jj8Eqe85Ia6kAN0RdrR1DsEAnhilOR9dvYwrAwtZHHinWn0yPcCO/HNPBwC94EH82o7U0AG7EtO/FMO!joG7twFuqgzOl5iSGjudoENSc+57SYM9nfk/MoI3qlry9iPqdb8TKIYzkYsTFZhnAjpsjoccasSz!tHw=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3182
Date: 2006-02-27T05:47:25-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Martin Krischik wrote:
> Hello
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ada_Information_Clearinghouse
> 
> Should we defend the entry? If so we need a reason why the "Ada
> Information Clearinghouse" site is "notable"
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WEB).
> 
> Martin
> 
> PS: I am not talkin about everybody here putting up a '''keep''' entry.
> 

I agree with the deletion. While the AdaIC is useful, it really is not 
important enough to have its owk wikipedia entry.

It probably should/could be linked from the wikipedia Ada entry.