From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "robin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <2006052509454116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <4475DA0F.5030603@comcast.net> <2006052514574816807-gsande@worldnetattnet> Subject: Re: Checking for Undefined X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 14:29:31 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.139.71.84 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1148740171 144.139.71.84 (Sun, 28 May 2006 00:29:31 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:29:31 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4539 comp.lang.fortran:10350 comp.lang.pl1:1765 Date: 2006-05-27T14:29:31+00:00 List-Id: "Gordon Sande" wrote in message news:2006052514574816807-gsande@worldnetattnet... > The original WatFor for IBM/7040 used a hardware hack. They set bad parity > but since they were a load and go system they had a symbol table around > and did the lookup for you. When WatFor moved to IBM/360 the feature was so > popular that they had to work hard to reproduce the feature. It wouldn't have been "hard". It only required the initialization of variables with a certain value, e.g., for integers, -2**31 and for float, -HUGE(1.0) etc. (An unlikely but feasible alternative : a bit map.)