From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: f8899,3c634d3864722c74
X-Google-Thread: 10dd18,3c634d3864722c74
X-Google-Thread: f4fd2,3c634d3864722c74
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3c634d3864722c74
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8899,gid10dd18,gidf4fd2,gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news.addix.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail
From: Joachim Durchholz <jo@durchholz.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.haskell,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Choosing a new language
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:41:36 +0100
Organization: 1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID: <fl802v$l8d$1@online.de>
References: <20071228162351.f29a3ce4.coolzone@it.dk>
 <477561af$0$36390$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
 <e2san397g3fqop93k7el3doplle6m4r714@4ax.com> <fl5418$cvp$2@online.de>
 <7x4pe1on7y.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <fl62qq$ke2$1@online.de>
 <op.t33zyzdzut4oq5@pandora.alfanett.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p57b625da.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: online.de 1199014816 21773 87.182.37.218 (30 Dec 2007 11:40:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
In-Reply-To: <op.t33zyzdzut4oq5@pandora.alfanett.no>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.haskell:1014 comp.lang.python:161167
 comp.lang.lisp:76518 comp.lang.ada:19079
Date: 2007-12-30T12:41:36+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

John Thingstad schrieb:
> Skrev Joachim Durchholz <jo@durchholz.org>:
> 
>> However, for web applications, I found a far easier variant: I just 
>> reload the page being debugged. (I have to make sure that the backend 
>> is in the same state when reloading, but that's usually easy to 
>> accomplish.)
>> So web pages are one area where code modification during debugging is 
>> less important.
> 
> Haveyou looked at selenium?

Yes. I couldn't get it to work.
I think it's more regression testing than debugging though. If that's 
correct, it's less pertinent to this subthread (which is already well 
off-topic already).

Regards,
Jo