From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a function Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:41:05 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <41b794ec-26b0-485e-a959-580a5b877a3b@f15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8e09c20d-172e-42a2-b2ff-994863893523@h12g2000yql.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.112 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265953265 21845 127.0.0.1 (12 Feb 2010 05:41:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.112; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9160 Date: 2010-02-11T21:41:05-08:00 List-Id: On 12 f=E9v, 00:24, Robert A Duff wrote: > Well, I don't find it "graceful" that single-element positional > aggregates are not allowed. =A0And zero-element ones. =A0I think > it's just bad language design. It seems you are suggesting the ambiguity should be resolved semantically. Why not :)