From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,859116256d0a7bc2
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.74.197 with SMTP id w5mr766588pav.1.1343453803363;
        Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 c10ni44949pbw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: basic question on nested packages
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <fe9b2dea-c076-4cec-8b42-2ee6ff56569e@googlegroups.com>
References: <juvlur$5du$1@speranza.aioe.org> <juvt8d$ijs$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.20.190.126
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343453803 28157 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2012 05:36:43
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 05:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nma@12000.org
In-Reply-To: <juvt8d$ijs$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=69.20.190.126;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-07-27T22:36:42-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, July 27, 2012 11:27:31 PM UTC-6, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> On 7/27/2012 10:22 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> 
> >
> > What I think would be better is to have ONE lapack package and
> > with the above packages as nested packages.
> ref (me)
> 
> I think may be I need to use 'child packages', not 'nested pacakges',
> but not sure yet.
> 
> I am doing a crash course now reading an ada book to learn more
> the difference between these and which one to use....

You could likely use nested packages; though child packages will likely be better for maintainability, but if they're short/simple child packages make good sense.