From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.129.179.135 with SMTP id r129mr5692980ywh.162.1477052736330;
        Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.39.131 with SMTP id c3mr2420002otb.15.1477052736288;
 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!f6no1118615qtd.0!news-out.google.com!203ni823itk.0!nntp.google.com!e187no1393299itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <nucqtf$54s$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.91.37.131;
 posting-account=hya6vwoAAADTA0O27Aq3u6Su3lQKpSMz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.91.37.131
References: <7eaadf74-c55f-4c00-8f13-bf027cce130e@googlegroups.com>
 <nub1t5$iec$1@dont-email.me>
 <fdcc461d-0800-42e5-a130-a31a7edd5e3b@googlegroups.com>
 <nucqtf$54s$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fe95bea1-a637-4f22-9cc1-f5441b8f79fc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: LLVM and Ada
From: vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:25:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32152
Date: 2016-10-21T05:25:35-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le vendredi 21 octobre 2016 12:33:41 UTC+2, Brian Drummond a =C3=A9crit=C2=
=A0:

Thank you very much Brian for your kind and complete response !

> The DragonEgg compiler did have such support but as far as I know it was=
=20
> incomplete in some resperts - memory suggests, exception propagation=20
> didn't work properly for local subprograms, but I'm vague on the details.
>=20
That's a pity indeed. And I suppose it is a difficult point to solve in LLV=
M...


> So the compilation stage between "ortho" and the LLVM backend may be=20
> worth looking at, to help develop your own compiler.

Yes ! That's exactly what I expected. I will have a look at it.
Kind regards,

Vincent