From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbcfe2b0a74da57e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Inherited Methods and such
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:40:00 -0500
Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server
Message-ID: <fdjvmj$e4b$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <1190296353.624737.150940@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
   <11m13st1f92kf$.m8s6y8mc8ebk.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1190321119.206313.65290@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
   <egz670qwxgyj$.15oz5zin5794w$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1190408526.100291.265040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
   <9ukf2wtqjs0q$.iuijmal4x56b$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1190497995.498679.119190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <1mw3qju08q8uj.sgzht7ld9ydc$.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1190579805.451187.71140@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <1i8ksr774bjbj.vpmnx3c0i9qz.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1190646125.024072.310020@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <1r9s9v6pcjifl.vp4ktk0unpd1.dlg@40tude.net>
   <1190753631.240548.101820@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
   <wcck5qdpq92.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <1190843408.713838.128690@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
   <wccps02fw9v.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
   <wcchclefuge.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1191012272.457766.273330@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1191019027 14475 69.95.181.76 (28 Sep 2007 22:37:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2208
Date: 2007-09-28T17:40:00-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Maciej Sobczak" <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191012272.457766.273330@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
...
> Yes, this example is convincing.
> How would you recommend using this pattern with controlled types?
>
> I might need controlled for the finalization part - do you recommend
> ignoring the Initialize operation in this case?

If you have first-class constructor function(s), you don't need Initialize.
Using both is likely to cause confusion. Especially as it will not be called
for an aggregate, so if it does anything valuable, it won't happen in those
cases.

                 Randy.