From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbcfe2b0a74da57e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Inherited Methods and such Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:35:45 -0500 Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server Message-ID: References: <1190296353.624737.150940@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <11m13st1f92kf$.m8s6y8mc8ebk.dlg@40tude.net> <1190321119.206313.65290@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1190408526.100291.265040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <9ukf2wtqjs0q$.iuijmal4x56b$.dlg@40tude.net> <1190497995.498679.119190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <1mw3qju08q8uj.sgzht7ld9ydc$.dlg@40tude.net> <1190579805.451187.71140@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1i8ksr774bjbj.vpmnx3c0i9qz.dlg@40tude.net> <1190646125.024072.310020@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <1r9s9v6pcjifl.vp4ktk0unpd1.dlg@40tude.net> <1190753631.240548.101820@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <1190842629.099822.65770@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1190927328.753361.138630@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <1191011579.746176.80370@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1191018772 14034 69.95.181.76 (28 Sep 2007 22:32:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:32:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2207 Date: 2007-09-28T17:35:45-05:00 List-Id: "Maciej Sobczak" wrote in message news:1191011579.746176.80370@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > BTW - your argument about covering this issue with education is > dangerous - someone might use it against you the next time anybody > criticizes "other" languages for being error prone... ;-) I actually worried about that when I wrote it, but I left it because expecting 100% detection of errors isn't possible; there are always some that will get through. And it's not clear to me that anyone would use such a language. But that doesn't excuse languages that only detect 10% of common errors. Ada strikes nearly the right balance (although I'd like the option to detect of uninitialized objects to be required; pragma Normalize_Scalars is both optional and doesn't detect all such objects). Randy.