From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Niklas Holsti Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Prologue and epilogue aspects Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 08:59:00 +0200 Organization: Tidorum Ltd Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Ql/T8M3UBK+JeOzo94K50wx+7tvYsLjInmaGjmzZ99vzNx2b5h Cancel-Lock: sha1:pDk+shttSSEYpnlMx4E8m3hkSlA= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50273 Date: 2018-02-02T08:59:00+02:00 List-Id: On 18-02-02 01:47 , Randy Brukardt wrote: [about finalization, etc., with Dmitry A. Kazakov] > The only practical way to that is similar to the way that AdaCore does that > (for both finalization and exception handling), [...] > > And I doubt that even the AdaCore scheme quite matches to your goals. Plus > the lack of safety (there now are many ways to get skip finalization on > objects), I ask for clarification: do you mean that AdaCore's finalization methods allow finalization to be skipped (which would be bad), or that skips could happen if Dmitry's suggestions were to be adopted? -- Niklas Holsti Tidorum Ltd niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ .