From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3ac0f9399164ca9f X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Vadim Godunko Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Qt vs. GTK+ (was: Qt Ada database support?) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <0b27299b-c0ba-4592-a312-7192da923522@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <716f92f0-18c0-4b0c-bf0d-2d85c77bd6d4@t16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.178.93.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244642456 20032 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2009 14:00:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.178.93.129; posting-account=niG3UgoAAAD7iQ3takWjEn_gw6D9X3ww User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042700 SUSE/3.0.10-1.1.1 Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6416 Date: 2009-06-10T07:00:56-07:00 List-Id: On Jun 10, 2:45=A0pm, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > The fact that Qt is pure GPL whereas GTK+ is LGPL might be important > to some people but not for Ada programmers since both QtAda and GtkAda > are pure GPL. > Qt Software/Nokia released Qt 4.5 under GPL _and_ LGPL - you can choose what you want. Nethertheless, it doesn't change anything in Ada world.