From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.77.87 with SMTP id a84mr5375526ywb.30.1477038723697; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:32:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.33.166 with SMTP id s35mr2326541otb.10.1477038723660; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!f6no1030099qtd.0!news-out.google.com!w143ni280itb.0!nntp.google.com!66no1292183itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:32:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.91.37.131; posting-account=hya6vwoAAADTA0O27Aq3u6Su3lQKpSMz NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.91.37.131 References: <7eaadf74-c55f-4c00-8f13-bf027cce130e@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LLVM and Ada From: vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:32:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32150 Date: 2016-10-21T01:32:03-07:00 List-Id: Le jeudi 20 octobre 2016 20:20:44 UTC+2, Simon Clubley a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > There is no viable Ada frontend for current versions of LLVM (AFAIK) > although various people have looked at this. Thank you Simon for your answer.=20 Why Gnat on LLVM has been abandoned ? Was LLVM less appropriate than GCC fo= r GNAT=C2=A0? My question precisely was not about the Ada frontend in fact but about a bi= nding to use the LLVM from an Ada program that is a sort of compiler. I thi= nk that those who ported GNAT to LLVM=C2=A0should have created this kind of= binding, no ? Kind regards, Vincent=20 =20