From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q33g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT
	GPL 2009?
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <fcd47912-7d6b-4a14-aa49-cc08c12a0c42@q33g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<9d86256d-a0f3-4c43-82f9-98bb4641be69@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<54839eeb-fe35-49eb-9c67-41a81879f8fd@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
	<3f59f2ec-c222-421f-91ba-0247a8268fdb@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240942681 19872 127.0.0.1 (28 Apr 2009 18:18:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:18:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q33g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218;
	posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.0.10)
	Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5582
Date: 2009-04-28T11:18:00-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 27, 3:03=A0pm, Vadim Godunko <vgodu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > $ gnatmake --help
>
> <skip>
>
> Report bugs to rep...@adacore.com

I'll grant that it's not completely and utterly absent, but I must
tell you that I'm very much in the habit of looking at the point of
distribution as also a point of reporting. I am very much not in the
habit in running random executables in the hopes of discovering such
information.

I am however, like you, amused at this.