From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.157.6 with SMTP id g6mr7799054ioe.8.1518757462358;
        Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:04:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.112.141 with SMTP id l13mr173735otj.1.1518757462287;
 Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w142no270945ita.0!news-out.google.com!m16ni935itm.0!nntp.google.com!w142no270941ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:04:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p5p9v3$1v69$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.166.230.152;
 posting-account=bPTmZAoAAAC_6HP9XLKB9aAAxBa6BuOR
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.166.230.152
References: <f1cc3c80-9b31-4a74-a201-0e209a789fc4@googlegroups.com>
 <1892f04b-0223-4060-90a7-91983f775f18@googlegroups.com>
 <752bb990-b70a-4fce-8cd7-91d4f8ee7ea1@googlegroups.com>
 <91e9a70d-0c7a-4577-a48f-8f31b60eadb2@googlegroups.com>
 <p5p9v3$1v69$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fcb77f00-5c4b-44f1-aa48-17ca837ac0e6@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How to optimize use of RAM/disk access ?
From: reinert <reinkor@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:04:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50465
Date: 2018-02-15T21:04:22-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Thanks all for the help. I have started to test out. A point here (for me) =
seems to be that some computers are much slower on disk operations than oth=
ers. My program is mush slower on my laptop than on my desktop. So optimiza=
tion for a laptop seems to be somehow different as compared to a desktop.

reinert