From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.182.97.2 with SMTP id dw2mr7216366obb.0.1424936102199; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:35:02 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.95.177 with SMTP id i46mr5266qge.3.1424936102095; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:35:02 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!hl2no31301284igb.0!news-out.google.com!n6ni189qar.0!nntp.google.com!i13no8014784qae.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:35:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=105.236.75.241; posting-account=orbgeAkAAADzWCTlruxuX_Ts4lIq8C5J NNTP-Posting-Host: 105.236.75.241 References: <8e30f54c-81c4-4861-897c-bb6c563c76e8@googlegroups.com> <87wq37d12w.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <7ae5ec06-f5e3-4c5f-ac95-58b4bf1256a0@googlegroups.com> <87egpfzapq.fsf@theworld.com> <99705630-02e3-4e43-9307-83e55336bc15@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: silly ravenscar question From: jan.de.kruyf@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:35:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25041 Date: 2015-02-25T23:35:01-08:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 7:50:17 PM UTC+2, Simon Wright wrote: > > In fairness, you did say that there is *no* "No_Unchecked_Deallocation"! > Thats what I love about programming in Ada. Its full of sh*t, but ultimately it _is_ fair. (; Was it you that had read the Gnat spec for the STM34 x-compiler? About memory allocation and that? cause I did not find it. I had a first look at the zfp package. Do you know what would be missing in the language there? Because the interrupt latencies in the Ravenscar implementation are NOT pleasant. Adacore has long and involved things before we get to the handler. cheers, j.