From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e519:: with SMTP id y25mr19036814ioc.36.1546355069878; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 07:04:29 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:4c97:: with SMTP id z145mr501352oia.2.1546355069677; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 07:04:29 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!k10no45012itk.0!news-out.google.com!v141ni153ita.0!nntp.google.com!q69no45044itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 07:04:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.114.128.31; posting-account=MRPdDAoAAADUJmZVjnYaoafXFMadSeY1 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.114.128.31 References: <177bddd8-297e-4c5f-85aa-31cd694e68b4@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: protobuff for Ada From: Olivier Henley Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 15:04:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55150 Date: 2019-01-01T07:04:29-08:00 List-Id: > * Its backed by a large corporation. true > * The technology is well known. true > * 99.9% of the programming population think that they are the salvation > to serialization. true, until they switch to Cap'N Proto ... or any other one. We may be good for 10 years though. > And on top. > * The are significantly more then one project where the lack of protobuf > support has ruled out Ada as implementation technology. very true (grpc which would give a low hanging DGraph(https://dgraph.io/) Ada client) > /And my intent was to eliminate at least the last points even if the > technology is inferior. +1