From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,2ca6699680c26b1c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: On database interface libraries for Ada Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <36aef854-3665-4a39-a8a9-243521a4761d@w36g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <1t9si695ko28h$.mh8uo0i4xh9j.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1272623493 389 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2010 10:31:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197; posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009012111 Red Hat/3.0.6-1.el5 Firefox/3.0.6,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11262 Date: 2010-04-30T03:31:33-07:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT), Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Libraries/Database > > What about a separate section for embedded / single file data bases e.g. > SQLite, Berkeley etc? From my point of view it is a quite different topic > from the bindings to/as DBMS clients. On the one hand I think that's a valid distinction. On the other, such a split would lead to duplicate information since, for example, GNADE, QtAda and gnatcoll support both embedded and client-server databases. Also, this is a property of the target database engine, not necessarily of the Ada binding. Maybe adding a note that SQLite is in-process (linked either statically or dynamically) would be sufficient. (I do not know of a Berkeley DB binding, yet...) -- Ludovic Brenta.