From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:64c:: with SMTP id 73-v6mr4952603itv.11.1530537232868;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2018 06:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c744:: with SMTP id
 x65-v6mr2245540oif.2.1530537232771;
 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 06:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!d7-v6no3036353itj.0!news-out.google.com!z3-v6ni2516iti.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no3036348itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 06:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pha7tr$1hc5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=194.39.218.10;
 posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.39.218.10
References: <e72534b1-17a7-40b5-92b9-01a4695e2743@googlegroups.com>
 <993f28de-6a64-480b-9c6e-d9714bcdef0d@googlegroups.com>
 <dbc90b0f-dc9b-4e5d-8009-7f02547055ca@googlegroups.com>
 <pgcuqh$7ij$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <167bec10-2a52-4c79-958d-91faadad915b@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdhag$1aa2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <2d6a5ab7-812f-47a9-a958-44177a3cf203@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdlc0$1hnt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <64a526cb-e6d5-44a6-b446-5b652ebe60ca@googlegroups.com>
 <pgdoip$1ntl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ph6a8f$vue$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <ph6b2l$1cta$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ph6cue$v90$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <ph7fnd$1bor$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <845ed7d6-f0c0-4c6e-834c-eea8f2ad1792@googlegroups.com>
 <pha7tr$1hc5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fbb45b0a-0098-43f8-8ecf-950d82dbb221@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada lacks lighterweight-than-task parallelism
From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:13:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53503
Date: 2018-07-02T06:13:52-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"To me that is still a property of the enumerated object rather than of the loop." (Kasakov)

Hmmm... are there not cases where the *same* "unordered" object sustains two (separated) loops, loop1 truly "unordered" but loop2 with more complex processing requiring *order*?

(Hence loop1 parallelizeable but loop2 not.)