From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5373b7ba73e9421 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ada novice Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: installing SPARK GPL on Windows Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <1d6d0e90-c9cd-4b62-a542-467a19e69095@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.11.22.91 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1281215049 10231 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2010 21:04:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 21:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.11.22.91; posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12941 Date: 2010-08-07T14:04:09-07:00 List-Id: On Aug 7, 10:30=A0pm, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) wrote: > This is not a SPARK GPL limitation (if I am not failing to understand =A0 > you), this is a SPARK feature. This is a feature of SPARK to be a safe (i= n =A0 > some regards) subset of Ada. > > SPARK GPL is still full SPARK (more or less). Yes, you said it right: SPARK is a safe subset of Ada. I was wrong in adding the term GPL as you realized. > > -- > There is even better than a pragma Assert: a SPARK --# check. > --# check C and WhoKnowWhat and YouKnowWho; > --# assert Ada; > -- =A0i.e. forget about previous premises which leads to conclusion > -- =A0and start with new conclusion as premise. It's hard for me to understand what you wrote here...but hopefully I'll understand with time :). Thanks YC