From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6286c332c8cae43d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-26 05:25:56 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: hfrumblefoot@yahoo.com (Hambut)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Text_IO.End_Of_File Problem
Date: 26 Nov 2001 05:25:50 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <fb75c450.0111260525.2c02157@posting.google.com>
References: <fb75c450.0111251442.3e88ff5f@posting.google.com>
 <3C01A0AA.AF2F54BF@acm.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.131.227.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1006781150 22919 127.0.0.1 (26 Nov 2001 13:25:51
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Nov 2001 13:25:51 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16979
Date: 2001-11-26T13:25:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey Carter <jrcarter@acm.org> wrote in message news:<3C01A0AA.AF2F54BF@acm.org>...

<snip>

In an earlier reply I said that I thought the way that end_of_file
works seemed non-intuitive.  Well after a little thought it doesn't
seem so non-intuitive now.  So please disregard those comments.

I was mixing end_of_file with an imaginary
'end_of_characters_for_get_to_return' function.  I think there was a
cognitive error in my thoughts at the time.....