From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87882caa9ec660b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-03 13:28:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: hfrumblefoot@yahoo.com (Hambut) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Which OO is in ?? Date: 3 Aug 2001 13:28:54 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <9kc0h3$ftu$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.188.131.21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 996870534 8670 127.0.0.1 (3 Aug 2001 20:28:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Aug 2001 20:28:54 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11263 Date: 2001-08-03T20:28:54+00:00 List-Id: "Martin Dowie" wrote in message news:<3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com>... > Hambut wrote in message > news:f75c450.0108030127.6c60f9a2@posting.google.com... > > I think it's probably even more straight forward for new projects now. > [snip] > > sub-set. Which may mean that the sub-set is subverted, and that the > > benefits you should gain from the sub-set are not gained. > > I think the original poster is asking what method he would use > together with UML (if that were the notation chosen). > Fair enough. It is still probably important to think carefully about how the notation maps to the implementation language before use ( OK so this is probably almost a 'how to suck eggs' kind of thing - but for a project using a sub-set I would guess that it's very easy to not think this issue).