From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.175.42 with SMTP id y30mr3510138yhl.42.1402622492725; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.103.104 with SMTP id fv8mr4628igb.2.1402622492623; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!i13no216164qae.1!news-out.google.com!gi6ni44igc.0!nntp.google.com!a13no124105igq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.252.147.203; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.252.147.203 References: <190f7de4-580c-445e-b63a-aec04f8bd417@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: Interval arithmetic for Ada v1.11 released From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 01:21:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 1908 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3750805911 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20275 Date: 2014-06-12T18:21:32-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, June 12, 2014 8:01:16 PM UTC-5, Shark8 wrote: > On 12-Jun-14 18:34, Dan'l Miller wrote: > > 2) inventorying the feature-set of corresponding Boost libraries for C++ > > to see if Ada's analogous libraries have reached feature-parity with Boost? > >(Or whether Boost's analogue has yet achieved feature-parity for a more- > >capable Ada library?) The key words in my posting were "corresponding" and "analogue". > Well, some portions of Boost are, well, irrelevant/unneeded in any Ada > library because the language itself takes care of it; case in point: > parallelism. For example, parallelism is not corresponding to interval arithmetic as an analogous library---hence non sequitur.