From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,859116256d0a7bc2
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.77.3 with SMTP id o3mr736122paw.13.1343469201779;
        Sat, 28 Jul 2012 02:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p10ni72325294pbh.1!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: basic question on nested packages
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 02:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <fad41cd5-4182-42e8-b367-69d91f447cb0@googlegroups.com>
References: <juvlur$5du$1@speranza.aioe.org> <juvt8d$ijs$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <fe9b2dea-c076-4cec-8b42-2ee6ff56569e@googlegroups.com>
 <jv09pe$d9a$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.7.125.76
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343469201 20606 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2012 09:53:21
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:53:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nma@12000.org
In-Reply-To: <jv09pe$d9a$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.7.125.76;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Received-Bytes: 1859
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-07-28T02:53:21-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:01:25 AM UTC+2, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> The only surprise for me, was that I had to WITH the 'driver' which is a
> child package of the parent lapack package explicitly to use it from the
> client even though I withed the parent package.
>
> I thought, since it is a child package of lapack, then it will be pulled in
> automatically by just WITH'ing lapack. But no.
> i.e. I thought by inviting the parent in, the children will come along
> with the parent and not be left alone outside.

It's just the other way round. Withing the child implicitly withs the parent:

with Parent.Child;  -- no need to with Parent

It would indeed be confusing if you could see the child, but not the parent.