From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c08a7609345f4e5
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Vadim Godunko <vgodunko@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Limited use for limited with?
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <fa6fcda4-8881-4560-b32a-32aa5cf0a501@26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <853314bc-0f79-435f-86a5-d7bcdd610731@c10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.165.8.252
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1285666327 12610 127.0.0.1 (28 Sep 2010 09:32:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=109.165.8.252;
 posting-account=niG3UgoAAAD7iQ3takWjEn_gw6D9X3ww
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10)
 Gecko/20100914 SUSE/3.6.10-0.3.1 Firefox/3.6.10,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14288
Date: 2010-09-28T02:32:07-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sep 28, 11:37=A0am, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In such cases, where the design intent is pretty clear (pass around
> references to Objects) I find that limited with does not really bring
> the functionality that it is supposed to provide.
>
It is how limited with is defined. Ada2012 should relax rules to make
limited with more useful.