From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.157.89.201 with SMTP id u9mr30598906otg.123.1494288330881;
        Mon, 08 May 2017 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.37.213 with SMTP id q79mr1310781ota.11.1494288330813;
 Mon, 08 May 2017 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!c26no1601797itd.0!news-out.google.com!v18ni2394ita.0!nntp.google.com!c26no1601791itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <oeq60s$18c1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=173.71.201.205;
 posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.71.201.205
References: <e8d229c0-317e-4f5a-8d54-cf56c3aede7a@googlegroups.com>
 <0fc56bf7-1cfa-4776-9c47-a573db315c5f@googlegroups.com>
 <oep7mj$1g3f$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <e87ac3c3-8390-4d1d-979d-0bcc7e4d3dde@googlegroups.com>
 <oeq60s$18c1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fa4b4108-5cd5-4fc7-9f00-8b61606056ac@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Portable memory barrier?
From: Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 00:05:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46713
Date: 2017-05-08T17:05:30-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 12:22:55 PM UTC-4, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:  
> For practical use when the buffer size is > 1 there cannot be any problem.

I saw you mention this earlier.  Why does the buffer size prevent that problem?