From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f297d5b850ee1e61 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-05 12:46:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada2005 clear screen etc. Date: 5 Mar 2003 14:46:15 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <87f5a614.0303011527.4cb09de2@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1046897120 14464 192.135.80.34 (5 Mar 2003 20:45:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34935 Date: 2003-03-05T14:46:15-06:00 List-Id: In article , Stephen Leake writes: > However, the ANSI standard for terminals has been around for a long > time, and still has some use. Why not put it in the Ada standard? Because the Ada standard should be for things that require support from the compiler vendor. There should be a body of widely used libraries that can be augmented on a more frequent basis than the cycle for the language standard, but we will never get there so long as people insist on shoving everything into the language standard.