From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-10 21:00:33 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:05:05 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:01:07 -0500
From: Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C bug of the day
References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <memo.20030605193115.9141A@brangdon.madasafish.com>
 <d6652001.0306100323.338a2a1c@posting.google.com>
 <bc4n70$fei5u$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
 <slrnbeboi5.1qc.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <82347202.0306101232.16776a81@posting.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <82347202.0306101232.16776a81@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <fOOdnX15fpHvN3ujXTWcqg@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.16
X-Trace: 
 sv3-VdJ03KQymFJqpzlq+rXmNHgYfS6NwlhKY1ftfVTItEcTzEWzyCD4itTdkght+8HlNaBOPqZecAQLe1h!YKHfMvKMQ1fbh/EpzhHLk9f9sjOC8577VzTesxZna8QEiM8DW+NjInf+Nv8rGMdbdVJO0PbGQbzJ!n2gP
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38946
Date: 2003-06-10T23:01:07-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>>>> I'd rather have a language
>>>>in which all of the defaults were fundamentally safe, but with the
>>>>freedom to override them if you had special constraints, or even in
>>>>cases where you came across a case which the language authors hadn't
>>>>considered.  I don't know such a language, however; it may exist
>>>>somewhere, but if it does, it certainly isn't very popular or wide
>>>>spread.

> This is even more disappointing coming from the author (James Kanze).
> I have had email conversations with him about Ada. He has heard of Ada.
> He has never used Ada. He does not understand what he has been told.

Sounds to me like he knows he's describing Ada
and pretending he doesn't.
Could it be a subtle form of trolling ?