From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,803d147296719896 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny01.POSTED!f0d9c8c1!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Anonymous Coward Subject: Re: Puzzling small piece of code - exception block essentially used as goto References: <5vwsyh9xki.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:55:39 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.86.114.139 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny01 1181264139 72.86.114.139 (Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:55:39 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:55:39 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16096 Date: 2007-06-08T00:55:39+00:00 List-Id: On 2007-06-06, Markus E Leypold wrote: > > I can understand why you're posting as "Anonymous Coward" :-). Are you implying that the quality of the code is reasonable, and the one opposed to it should be a coward for objecting to it? Or are you saying the code quality is poor, and the author should be a coward?