From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38ceb882eed41e1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-30 18:51:21 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Size and pack
Date: 30 Oct 2001 20:51:12 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <fHhUXCLw8$BF@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <EohC7.32898$pb4.16108301@news2.rdc2.tx.home.com>
 <_umC7.74983$gT6.38373531@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com>
 <slrn9tq9mi.nt.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <xSlQNRG4wlOM@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <slrn9tqd33.c7n.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
 <5ee5b646.0110301800.55e5d2d7@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1004496674 18134 192.135.80.34 (31 Oct 2001
 02:51:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 02:51:14 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15459
Date: 2001-10-30T20:51:12-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <5ee5b646.0110301800.55e5d2d7@posting.google.com>, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:
> lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote in message news:<slrn9tqd33.c7n.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>...
>> OSF/1. Yep, and I added a pragma Atomic to provocate this effect.
> 
> Again, this is a bug, if the compiler accepts a set of
> declarations, it must generate proper code.

Is there no way for GNAT to generate code specific to the newer
Alpha chips ?  If that were done and the code were run on an
older Alpha chip, I would expect a runtime error.