From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:460b:: with SMTP id p11mr4526929qtn.233.1583361190890;
        Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:33:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:1a17:: with SMTP id a23mr3215774oia.84.1583361190553;
 Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 14:33:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <r3mqee$132$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.239.228;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.239.228
References: <e92d8c8d-a182-4990-b3f6-33c2ab90bce9@googlegroups.com>
 <lyv9nl8p6w.fsf@pushface.org> <r3mqee$132$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f94395b7-f2de-4c49-8edd-b24bfa64cc37@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada.Calendar.Formatting.Image (or Time_Of) changing the time
From: Optikos <ZUERCHER_Andreas@outlook.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 22:33:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58172
Date: 2020-03-04T14:33:10-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 5:49:35 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> "Simon Wright" wrote in message=20
> news:lyv9nl8p6w.fsf@pushface.org...
> ...
> > There was a conversation on Ada-Comment in June last year, in which it
> > turned out that compiler implementers may have have been misinterpretin=
g
> > the ARM. It was quite confusing.
>=20
> Not just a conversation, but also a Binding Interpretation AI (which=20
> therefore applies to Ada 2012 compilers), AI12-0336-1.

Shouldn't these Binding AIs that take effect from a past edition of the ISO=
 standard onward (and not merely incorporated into Ada 2020 or Ada 202X pos=
t-2020) =E2=80=A2=E2=80=A2be an ISO/IEC corrigendum=E2=80=A2=E2=80=A2?  All=
owing errata be permanently published semi-officially in any forum other th=
an cummulatively in an official ISO/IEC corrigendum seems to be against the=
 ISO/IEC rules.