From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fef3ad775ef4b0b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d70g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: lbarowski@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada for 1st year students Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <60e0c5f0-1e17-4add-b21e-b1ef622d5233@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <67e0151c-ecdb-4a7a-b36b-6853f78e72df@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <7e002aa1-59cb-438b-af58-9227a4ecf7b6@i18g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.228.91.133 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1225154994 15732 127.0.0.1 (28 Oct 2008 00:49:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d70g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.228.91.133; posting-account=g0aIYQkAAABS3VLtu6u_AVIBllsWHSme User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 Firefox/2.0.0.17,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2507 Date: 2008-10-27T17:49:53-07:00 List-Id: On Oct 25, 3:36 pm, Marco wrote: > > But I do think adding the "j" to the name was a mistake, most folks > don't care what a program is written in (unless it is too slow). The fortunate thing for us was that Java did take off, especially for education. So although it may have turned some people off, the "j" probably did us more good than harm. > At > the time, it seemed like Ada was being abandoned for the upstart Java. > We never really liked the Java based version, because at the time, it > seemed a little slow. It was slow at that time, but we had faith in Moore's Law. The time needed to maintain, develop, and test two very different versions with a dozen different builds was killing our progress and stability. Having a more-or-less single codebase was well worth creating a new version and having it be a bit slow for a few years. ThisisLarrybarAtEngDotAuburnDotLearninginstitution [Posting from GG because Comcast no longer provides usenet access :( :( :( :( .]