From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.204.6 with SMTP id x6mr648383itf.52.1508480720381; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.23.167 with SMTP id j36mr177835otj.7.1508480720308; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.fcku.it!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!l196no2399522itl.0!news-out.google.com!u132ni688ita.0!nntp.google.com!l196no2399518itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:1206:45c6:8b20:78b0:51ad:fd2b:a006; posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:1206:45c6:8b20:78b0:51ad:fd2b:a006 References: <87mv4pvu2s.fsf@nightsong.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why does Ada compile slower than Python? From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:25:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 2988325223 X-Received-Bytes: 1672 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48524 Date: 2017-10-19T23:25:20-07:00 List-Id: > P.S. ObjectAda 7.2 was great. Pity that they dropped off. ObjectAda 9.x is much better ;-). Joke apart, they have caught up a lot: containers, dot notation, "raise x with ..." - probably most of the Ada 2005 standard.