From: Fabien Chouteau <fabien.chouteau@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 06:31:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f71cc789-9be5-4f7a-9e62-fe2cc97ebbe1o@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3b95127-bee2-47e2-aa9d-8d0a66668c0b@googlegroups.com>
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 at 7:59:04 PM UTC+2, Jesper Quorning wrote:
> The specification below compiles with CE2019 and GPL2017 but is rejected by > c_convention_records.ads:5:04: representation item must appear after type is fully defined
>
> Is this expected behaviour?
TM 13.1 (9.1/3) : An operational item that directly specifies an aspect of an entity shall appear before the entity is frozen (see 13.14)
The pragma should be rejected as well actually.
http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-13-1.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-04 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 17:59 Convention aspect stricter than before? - GNAT Community 2020 Jesper Quorning
2020-06-03 18:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-08-04 13:31 ` Fabien Chouteau [this message]
2020-08-08 3:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-08 9:46 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 0:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-08-10 6:35 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-10 9:15 ` Simon Wright
2020-08-10 14:53 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 7:18 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 7:34 ` Luke A. Guest
2020-08-11 16:23 ` Jesper Quorning
2020-08-11 19:23 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox