From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6327f05d4989a68d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Received: by 10.181.12.35 with SMTP id en3mr2998453wid.2.1357914003873; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:20:03 -0800 (PST) Path: o9ni6875wio.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.96.0.7.MISMATCH!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed.tele2net.at!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Press Release - Ada 2012 Language Standard Approved by ISO Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:21:14 +0100 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: References: <7wrdmbre6jw9.qww9l0uzj6mg.dlg@40tude.net> <14oqoq06zhlu2.tcasif3hdyhw.dlg@40tude.net> <1drh1q1ln2dfh$.a9hwlg01fjfy.dlg@40tude.net> <50d6365d$0$6577$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1pbg79bz92j3t$.sz41zduivjfp.dlg@40tude.net> <4c101d74-c8cb-45a6-82d4-91923bb950b0@googlegroups.com> <87sj6tre9s.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2013-01-11T15:21:14+01:00 List-Id: On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:28:50 +0100, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote: > Le Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:00:47 +0100, a �crit: > >> Finally, IMHO, exceptions are NOT a property of the interface but of the >> implementation (we will likely have to agree to disagree on this). > > May suggest there is two kinds of exceptions. The ones which are part of > the interface and the ones which are part of the implementation. > Declarations in the large goes this way too. Exception is never an implementation, because its propagation or non-propagation always changes the client's logic. It is same as to claim than an output parameter is a part of the implementation. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de