From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5164ccc41905b2d0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.213.197 with SMTP id gx5mr1817752qab.8.1362754416992;
        Fri, 08 Mar 2013 06:53:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.75.195 with SMTP id e3mr133306qew.24.1362754416969; Fri,
 08 Mar 2013 06:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 o5ni47qas.0!nntp.google.com!dd2no8253475qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:53:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <khbmmp$fd5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=189.77.226.1;
 posting-account=TRgI1QoAAABSsYi-ox3Pi6N-JEKKU0cu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 189.77.226.1
References: <fbdb8bd7-be77-4338-90ba-0b0c212f121f@googlegroups.com>
 <87k3pjht79.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <hr-dnULuncyRjqTM4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
 <khb8m6$933$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <3e01ac49-4427-4f50-8577-8edab7e539a6@googlegroups.com>
 <khbmmp$fd5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f6fff4ba-e9a1-4335-a4a0-cb9d60152ad9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada and OpenMP
From: "Rego, P." <pvrego@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:53:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2013-03-08T06:53:36-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:42:59 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote:

> Ada is about doing things right, and that should be true even for 
> implementation-defined stuff. And we *need* people to figure out good ways 
> of doing these things (for instance, a "parallel" classification for 
> functions would be very helpful). The sloppy way helps little.

Got your point. 
Would you have a suggestion on how I could a loop such as "parallelization" like

pragma OMP(Parallel_For) 
for I in 1 .. MAX loop 
   A(I) := A(I) + 1 
end loop; 

but without using pragmas?