From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:8c26:: with SMTP id l35mr2319875jak.3.1550839055999;
        Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:37:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:df55:: with SMTP id w82mr38029oig.6.1550839055888;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:37:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.166.216.MISMATCH!y42no93948ita.0!news-out.google.com!d79ni164itc.0!nntp.google.com!y22no94107ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:37:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <q4onqr$9rv$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83dc:6774:984:d5d1:168b:2ac9;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83dc:6774:984:d5d1:168b:2ac9
References: <f0886b90-11b5-48b5-8a9e-da9ad33a2a65@googlegroups.com>
 <54a5873a-57aa-40c6-8af4-a6f908d53593@googlegroups.com>
 <b773bbfa-9fd0-431a-8ff3-462b2c5ccd15@googlegroups.com>
 <q4kov7$40n$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <be2e3cf3-e452-4501-a960-822bf6432cd9@googlegroups.com>
 <q4nfgq$r4r$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <e5f7df5a-4e83-4c1f-82ad-ee286627ffbc@googlegroups.com>
 <q4onqr$9rv$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f6e597b0-e0d4-45ed-8233-258655508387@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 202x and square brackets
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:37:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2036
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1957537320
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55629
Date: 2019-02-22T04:37:35-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2019 12:53:00 UTC+1 schrieb J-P. Rosen:
> There are cases where you want to mix for clarity:
> ([1,2], [3,4])
I do not see that this enhances clarity, but rather raises questions about the difference.
I see new coding standards emerge saying: Use [] only for containers, not arrays. (I've seen lots of stupid rules in such coding standards.) So this would then be an array aggregate of container subaggregates.

> So what would your rule be?
Prhaps something like J.2(4)?