From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,f4f50970968de59d X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: sjw Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT project and search directories Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:42:45 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.30.110.254 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1262090565 4781 127.0.0.1 (29 Dec 2009 12:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.30.110.254; posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_2; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Safari/531.21.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8548 Date: 2009-12-29T04:42:45-08:00 List-Id: On Dec 29, 2:11=A0am, Stephen Leake wrote: > "Hibou57 (Yannick Duch ne)" writes: > > > By the way, just because I feel inquisitive with it : did someone know > > what is the license of the GPRBuild language ? > > The gprbuild and related tools are GPL (with or without the GNAT > modification, depending on where you get it). > > I assume by "the GPRBuild language" you mean the language used to > write GNAT Project files; *.gpr. > > I don't think the language is licensed separately. Normally, the way > to license a language is to publish a language definition. The gpr > language is not documented very clearly; partly in the GNAT Reference > Manual, partly in the GNAT User guide (_not_ in the GPRBuild user > guide!). Those documents are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation > license. > > This is only a concern if you are considering doing an independent > implementation of the language; is that the case? Also I think if Yannick was proposing to set up a business distributing GPR scripts.