From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ed9f245566db0d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-16 12:32:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!sdd.hp.com!usc.edu!attla2!ip.att.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question on arrays References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1032203723 12.234.13.56 (Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:15:23 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:15:23 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:15:23 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29044 Date: 2002-09-16T19:15:23+00:00 List-Id: I wonder if there's some problem the OP didn't mention. A segmentation fault seems a little surprising as a compiler error message for such a straightforward pair of errors. Does the segmentation fault still occur if you change the 2.0 to 2? Or if you get rid of the aggregate or change the array element to a slice?