"Pascal Obry" <pascal@obry.net> wrote in message
news:4669BBBB.8040806@obry.net...
> Stefan Lucks a �crit :
> > If a task fails to handle an exception raised somewhere inside, the task
> > silently dies -- without notifying anyone. Enforcing the subprograms
> > used by the task to precisely specify "this subprogram might raise these
> > exceptions and none else" would help a lot ...
>
> That's really different. And think about it, since a task is mapped to a
> thread which comes with its own stack... who could possibly handle this
> exception ?

And more importantly, where would it be raised? If it was raised in the
parent task, that could happen anywhere, which would be a design nightmare
(a different nightmare than the current one, anyway).

> And note that in Ada 2005 you can use Ada.Task_Termination to register
> termination notifications.

It's unfortunate that the default isn't to notify someone, however. Worse,
this interface might not work in out-of-memory circumstances (one of the
most common reasons for task failure, at least in Janus/Ada programs where
the default stack size is rather small).

                      Randy.