From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.42.194.6 with SMTP id dw6mr45768icb.22.1401995731997;
        Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.95.112 with SMTP id h103mr1104708qge.4.1401995731968;
 Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!c1no23613167igq.0!news-out.google.com!k18ni4648qav.1!nntp.google.com!j5no1806988qaq.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <867d052a-a179-4371-bb71-0aea5e0871ce@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.53.78.59;
 posting-account=ShYTIAoAAABytvcS76ZrG9GdaV-nXYKy
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.53.78.59
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <3bf7907b-2265-4314-a693-74792df531d1@googlegroups.com>
 <wccha40e9zh.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <lmpcc6$ivv$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <867d052a-a179-4371-bb71-0aea5e0871ce@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f3ba5237-bd01-4c62-a998-6228548869fb@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
From: sbelmont700@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:15:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20147
Date: 2014-06-05T12:15:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, June 5, 2014 11:55:30 AM UTC-4, Adam Beneschan wrote:
>=20
> Actually, now that I think about it, was Swift named after an author who =
lived three hundred years ago?  I guess time will tell whether this modest =
proposal of a language will have a big impact on the programming world, or =
whether the impact will be more Lilliputian.
>=20

The real question is, what approach will be taken with respect to byte-orde=
ring?