From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.52.28.116 with SMTP id a20mr5691657vdh.2.1397772159921; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.79.169 with SMTP id k9mr428263igx.12.1397772159752; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Path: border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cm18no3873589qab.0!news-out.google.com!gi6ni523igc.0!nntp.google.com!l13no8076633iga.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=KSa2aQoAAACOxnC0usBJYX8NE3x3a1Xq NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 References: <1ljwj8f.1wqbhvuabsdw1N%csampson@inetworld.net> <51c7d6d4-e3be-44d5-a4ce-f7e875345588@googlegroups.com> <%J32v.70539$kp1.45343@fx14.iad> <87tx9so50m.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Heartbleed From: Adam Beneschan Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:02:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Original-Bytes: 1966 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:185794 Date: 2014-04-17T15:02:39-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:54:56 PM UTC-7, Alan Jump wrote: > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:51:34 PM UTC-7, Shark8 wrote: > > > Is there a reason that C as the 'core' component would be any better > > than, say, FORTH? > > Not in my mind, since CPUs don't care about the human-readable language...all they care about is the bytecode the compiler generates. Wait, I thought we were talking about C ... how do "human-readable languages" fit into the discussion? -- Adam