From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,43127f177a55dc41
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.43.117.133 with SMTP id fm5mr16405950icc.7.1320368284053;
        Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p6ni68315pbn.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f29g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: limited allocated classwide types
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <f279ff29-5f23-474a-a187-069c419896dc@f29g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
References: <0ed43f83-40e7-46d3-8cc4-e1c41f500d28@c1g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>
 <m21utoer3d.fsf@pushface.org>
 <e3ca4799-e6e1-42c3-a522-d04b8221979f@er6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <5477be67-824f-446f-92d6-2aad668deb64@u12g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1320368283 18173 127.0.0.1 (4 Nov 2011 00:58:03
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 00:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f29g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: ARLUEHNKC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR
 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18819
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2011-11-03T17:51:13-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Nov 3, 5:30=A0pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 4:35=A0pm, Simon Belmont <sbelmont...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > More vexxing is that I can alter what happens in the presumably
> > incorrect case simply by adding, removing, and reordering the
> > functions in the spec (which smacks heavily of a mixed up vtable, to
> > excuse the c++ terminology), which the second response more-or-less
> > supports.
>
> Although there's no official Ada terminology, I think, a paragraph in
> the AARM calls it the "dispatch table". =A0We Ada people tend to prefer
> readable English over incomprehensible abbreviations.

Sorry, I missed that you had already used the "correct" term
previously.

                                 -- Adam