From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c0c2:: with SMTP id q185-v6mr8808339iof.134.1527614418788; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:20:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4712:: with SMTP id a18-v6mr1292530otf.1.1527614418345; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!newsreader5.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v8-v6no6676510itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni5683itb.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no6676507itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:20:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <10ae91d6-d6cd-4afe-87d5-2cfd9ff41d79@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.245.163.100; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.245.163.100 References: <2d717805-f6a4-4de9-bf4a-d45037034f96@googlegroups.com> <9b76440e-ab22-4fcf-8a54-f85a9d4d010a@googlegroups.com> <067fdb8b-e69c-4ec7-b7ae-50a11dc97d83@googlegroups.com> <71948f43-cf43-448f-a7b0-0e5982c98d90@googlegroups.com> <1e6ddc66-cb54-4023-8546-a1c0898c25d9@googlegroups.com> <10ae91d6-d6cd-4afe-87d5-2cfd9ff41d79@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: why "unconstrained subtype in component declaration" while said component given default value ? From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 17:20:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 2517 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3860398231 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52764 Date: 2018-05-29T10:20:17-07:00 List-Id: > type Unconstrained_Collection > (Maximum_Size : Positive) is new Abstract_Collection with private; > subtype Collection > is Unconstrained_Collection (Maximum_Size => Maximum_Size); It's close, but I would like to hide publicly the discriminants. I would like: one unconstrained subtype with (<>) which needs initialization, and one subtype who doesn't need it. In fact, I don't need necessarily subtypes: I could have: type A(<>) is private; type B is private; private type A( - discriminants with or without defaults -) is ... subtype B is A ( some values); -- not possible, I already complained about it. I can already get what I want if B is made a derived type of A. No need for tagged types here.