From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aa0f5be20f540641,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-18 09:04:58 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: hpk104@hotmail.com (Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: gcc 3.0 released
Date: 18 Jun 2001 09:04:58 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <f03d3b89.0106180804.268682d9@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.13.248.12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 992880298 23377 127.0.0.1 (18 Jun 2001 16:04:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jun 2001 16:04:58 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8850
Date: 2001-06-18T16:04:58+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

now that gcc 3.0 is released, I want to know if there are still plans
to incorporate gnat into gcc's source tree for 3.1?  Anybody know how
things stand as of now?