From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,da85d9aaf769b16a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Generic package parameters not externally visible : what's the
	rational ?
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <f016fc05-03bd-4a3b-9b65-714f41df74ac@v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <d31a3f23-975d-4ae7-954a-82055b50f172@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
	<wcciqe26w5q.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <hc7nfq$6o7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<wccaazcxvgn.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <b6d32b60-333f-495d-b17a-7ab589690bbb@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
	<hca52n$kom$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.171
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1256818887 13447 127.0.0.1 (29 Oct 2009 12:21:27
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:21:27 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.171;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8838
Date: 2009-10-29T05:21:27-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 28 oct, 20:12, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> "Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne)" <yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message=
news:b6d32b60-333f-495d-> By jove, I think he's got it! :-)

What does mean =93 By Jove =94 ? (I'm not native English, sorry).

> The above reasoning makes sense, and it actually seems to reflect the
> supposed rationale. It would be nice if a fuller example of this was
> included somewhere. (I'd put it into the AARM if I had any idea of where =
it
> should go.)
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Randy.

Do you want to say I should have given an example ? If so, I may try
to get one for a later reply.