From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.aset.psu.edu!not-for-mail From: "Bob Spooner" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada? Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:25:00 -0400 Organization: Penn State University, Center for Academic Computing Message-ID: References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <461B52A6.20102@obry.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: nat4.arl.psu.edu X-Trace: f04n12.cac.psu.edu 1176387900 26892 128.118.40.79 (12 Apr 2007 14:25:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@f04n12.cac.psu.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:25:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14938 Date: 2007-04-12T10:25:00-04:00 List-Id: "Brian May" wrote in message news:sa4irc33idm.fsf@margay.local... >>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Obry writes: > > Pascal> Why do they like fighting a language all the time > > People I have talked to avoid Ada because of the perception (real or > otherwise) that you have to fight the language all the time, and there > is only one way of doing things[1]. > > Not that I agree with this reasoning. > > Notes: > > [1] Unlike in, say Perl, where there are many ways of stating exactly > the same thing. When I find myself fighting the language, it usually means that I need to revisit my design. -- Bob