From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:18:38 -0500
Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server
Message-ID: <evk1ai$7as$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <sa4slb9dnqe.fsf@margay.local>
 <1176169724.087077.237410@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <tkejmsgtsq.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <evgn3p$des$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <tairc4km9k.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1176340626 7516 69.95.181.76 (12 Apr 2007 01:17:06
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:17:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feed.ac-versailles.fr!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14921
Date: 2007-04-11T20:18:38-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Markus E Leypold"
<development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de> wrote in
message news:tairc4km9k.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de...
...
> Randy -- I should ask that in a personal mail, but since it is also of
> interest at least to new comers in this group (and the Ada vendor FAQ
> doesn't exist any more?):
>
> Does Janus Ada run / work with Linux? I see a version for 386 Unix,
> but that seems to be for Interactive, SCO and friends: Something I
> haven't seen for some time any more. Is there a Linux version planned?

We don't have a Linux version at this time. My guess is that it wouldn't be
particularly difficult to port the old Unix version, but at lot of things
that seem "not too hard" have a way of taking a lot more time than expected.
It's on the roadmap but isn't scheduled for now. (Demand could change that,
of course.)

                               Randy.