From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f9c4ba3b0dc13ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-16 06:18:36 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!ub!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!godot.cc.duq.edu!toads.pgh.pa.us!evans.pgh.pa.us!user From: evans@evans.pgh.pa.us (Arthur Evans Jr) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Addressing functions Followup-To: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 09:18:36 -0500 Organization: Ada Consulting Message-ID: References: <3citrc$bb5@earth.usa.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: evans.pgh.pa.us cc: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Date: 1994-12-16T09:18:36-05:00 List-Id: In article , eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) wrote: > Having said that, it is legal Ada (83 & 95) to say: > [deleted] > pragma INTERFACE(Ada, Foo); It's clear that Ada-95 requires support of pragma interface to Ada (see Ada-95 RM B.1(11) and 6.3.1(3)). However, how do you conclude that Ada-83 requires such support? RM-83 doesn't mention Ada at all in 13.9. Art Evans Arthur Evans Jr, PhD Phone: 412-963-0839 Ada Consulting FAX: 412-963-0927 461 Fairview Road Pittsburgh PA 15238-1933 evans@evans.pgh.pa.us