From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d0a25a73025910f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-08 12:05:11 PST
Path: swrinde!gatech!newsfeed.pitt.edu!toads.pgh.pa.us!evans.pgh.pa.us!user
From: evans@evans.pgh.pa.us (Arthur Evans Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Summarise
Followup-To: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 14:57:42 -0500
Organization: Ada Consulting
Message-ID: <evans-080295145742@evans.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1995Feb1.204503.1378@cs.tcd.ie>
 <gauthier-0202951124430001@164.81.60.62> <3guv7j$l7t@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <1995Feb6.153045.4445@sei.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: evans.pgh.pa.us
Date: 1995-02-08T14:57:42-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1995Feb6.153045.4445@sei.cmu.edu>, firth@sei.cmu.edu
(Robert Firth) wrote:

> No, *all* of the citations spell the word "summarise", and none spells
> it in the OED form.

The American Heritage Dictionary, online version for the Macintosh,
copyright 1994, lists "summarize" and not "summarise".

Random House Dictionary, copyright 1968, lists "summarise" but admits
"summarize" as "chiefly British".

Art Evans