From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5abb98ddac989f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.teledata-fn.de!news.albasani.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New Ada Standard Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 19:01:31 -0500 Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1175558419 2030 69.95.181.76 (3 Apr 2007 00:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 00:00:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14753 Date: 2007-04-02T19:01:31-05:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" wrote in message news:C_9Qh.26450$oV.6870@attbi_s21... > Jeffrey D. Cherry wrote: > > > > I haven't purchased this document, yet. I just wanted to confirm that this > > is the new Ada05 standard that we've been waiting for. If it is, then should > > I be calling this the Ada07 standard? Also, will there be a reduced price > > version in the near future? (It is currently listed as US $238 from ANSI for > > a 1.44MB PDF file.) > > Some people are calling this Ada 2005. Some are calling it Ada 2007. > Some are calling it Ada 07. Mostly, though, I think we'll just call it Ada. > > I believe you can find the same text at > > http://www.adaic.org/standards/ada05.html > > for somewhat less than $238. It should be noted that the ISO version is the Amendment itself, which is a list of changes to the Ada 95 standard. It's not very easy to use. It makes much more sense to use one of the consolidated versions; you can get those from the above site; and you can get printed versions from Springer; see http://www.adaic.org/standards/articles/lrm.html. Randy Brukardt